CLEAN : S.Africa mining union welcomes Marikana report

The transcript discusses the findings of a commission regarding Lonmin's responsibility for urging employees to work despite potential dangers, leading to injuries and deaths. It highlights criticism of local leadership during a strike and the need for future considerations. The commission's recommendations on compensation for the dependents of deceased workers are also addressed, emphasizing the need for employer and state involvement.

What was the Commission's finding regarding Lonmin's actions during the strike?

• Lonmin was found reckless for urging employees to work despite dangers.

• Lonmin provided adequate compensation to all affected employees.

• Lonmin was not involved in the strike.

• Lonmin was praised for its safety measures.

How did Andrew M respond to the Commission's criticism?

• He ignored the findings.

• He denied any wrongdoing.

• He agreed to consider the findings for future conduct.

• He blamed the employees for the situation.

What was the local leadership's role during the strike according to the Commission?

• They encouraged non-striking workers to stay safe at home.

• They organized a peaceful protest.

• They advised non-striking workers to shop despite risks.

• They provided security for all workers.

What was the Commission's view on the compensation scheme for the dependents of the deceased?

• The Commission fully supported a state-implemented compensation scheme.

• The Commission found its terms of reference too narrow to cover compensation.

• The Commission recommended immediate compensation by the state.

• The Commission decided no compensation was necessary.

Who does Andrew M believe should pay compensation to the dependents of the deceased?

• Neither the employers nor the state

• Only the state

• Both the employers and the state

• Only the employers