Spain's Nadal Says Catalonia Should Come Back to Legality

The transcript discusses the Catalan Government's intentions to declare independence, highlighting the legal, social, and economic implications. It questions the likelihood of such a declaration and the potential response from the Spanish Prime Minister. The dialogue with Mr. Puigdemont's government is also considered, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the Spanish Constitution and the need for legal and democratic discussions.

What are the main reasons the central government advises against Catalonia's planned announcement?

• It is not supported by the European Union.

• It is not environmentally friendly.

• It is not popular among tourists.

• It is not legal, socially sound, or economically beneficial.

What is the central government's stance on Catalonia's potential declaration of independence?

• They are supportive of the move.

• They believe it should be decided by the regional government.

• They think it should be discussed with the European Union.

• They are indifferent to the outcome.

What does the central government suggest Catalonia should do instead of declaring independence?

• Form a new political party.

• Return to the legal framework of the Spanish Constitution.

• Seek support from other countries.

• Hold a new regional election.

Why is Mr. Puigdemont's government considered an invalid counterparty for talks?

• They have not been elected.

• They want to break the Spanish Constitution.

• They lack international support.

• They have no economic plan.

What historical fact is mentioned to argue against Catalonia's independence?

• Catalonia was never an independent country.

• Catalonia has no official language.

• Catalonia has always been economically dependent on Spain.

• 93% of Catalonia voted for the Spanish Constitution in 1978.