Dominic Raab MP giving daily government coronavirus press briefing

Jane Merrick questions the absence of scientists at briefings, highlighting the importance of scientific input in decision-making. The response emphasizes that while science informs decisions, it is constantly evolving, and politicians must make judgment calls. Future briefings will include experts as needed, but not daily, due to their other responsibilities. The discussion also touches on the reassurance provided by having experts present, especially during significant changes like shop reopenings.

Why are scientists and medics important in decision-making processes?

• They provide entertainment during briefings.

• They offer scientific insights that inform decisions.

• They are required by law to attend all briefings.

• They help politicians with public speaking.

What is the nature of scientific information according to the second section?

• It is fixed and unchanging.

• It is constantly evolving and fluid.

• It is irrelevant to political decisions.

• It is only important for medical officers.

What reassurance is given about the presence of scientists in press conferences?

• They will never attend again.

• They will attend only if there is a crisis.

• They will attend every single day.

• They will continue to attend but not daily.

What is the role of politicians in decision-making as discussed in the third section?

• To make judgment calls based on evolving scientific advice.

• To delegate all decisions to scientists.

• To rely solely on public opinion for decisions.

• To ignore scientific advice and make independent decisions.

Why is it important to have experts present during briefings?

• To reduce the workload of politicians.

• To entertain the audience with scientific facts.

• To replace politicians in decision-making.

• To ensure all questions from the public can be answered.