Principal Liable for Torts of an Agent

The video tutorial explains the differences between special and general agents, focusing on their authority and the principal's liability. It discusses the scope of an agent's authority and introduces the concept of 'frolic and detour,' where an agent acts outside their authorized scope. Examples are provided to illustrate these concepts, emphasizing when a principal is liable for an agent's actions. The tutorial concludes with a discussion on tort liability, highlighting that agents are personally liable for their tortious conduct, even when acting on behalf of the principal.

What is the primary difference between a special agent and a general agent in terms of liability?

• A general agent can act outside the scope of authority without consequences.

• A special agent can bind the principal in all actions.

• A general agent is not liable for tortious acts.

• A special agent's actions bind the principal only for specific tasks.

When is a principal not liable for the actions of their agent?

• When the agent acts outside the scope of authority.

• When the agent is a special agent.

• When the agent acts within the scope of authority.

• When the agent is a general agent.

What does the term 'frolic and detour' refer to?

• A principal's liability for all agent actions.

• An agent acting for personal reasons outside their authority.

• An agent acting within the scope of authority.

• A special agent's specific tasks.

In the context of agent liability, what happens if an agent uses a company vehicle for personal use without authorization?

• The principal is liable for any accidents.

• The agent is acting within the scope of employment.

• The agent is not personally liable.

• The principal is not liable for any accidents.

Who is always personally liable for tortious conduct, even if done in furtherance of the principal's business?

• The client

• The general public

• The agent

• The principal