CLEAN : War in Ukraine created 'new world' says Swedish finance minister

The transcript discusses the long-term changes in Russia and its new environment, which have influenced Sweden's debate on joining NATO. The cautious and respectful debate in Sweden concluded that joining NATO would enhance security. The transcript also questions why Sweden didn't apply to NATO during earlier conflicts like Georgia in 2008 and Crimea in 2014. It highlights the current level of violence and behavior of Russia, which is seen as surprising and risky, leading to global opposition.

What was the general consensus in Sweden regarding NATO membership?

• Most political parties and the population agreed on joining NATO.

• The debate was inconclusive.

• Most people opposed joining NATO.

• There was no debate on NATO membership.

Why did some people question Sweden's timing in applying for NATO membership?

• Because Sweden was not interested in NATO.

• Due to previous Russian actions in Georgia and Crimea.

• Due to Sweden's strong alliance with Russia.

• Because Sweden had already joined NATO.

How is Russia's current behavior described in the context of its past actions?

• As more peaceful than before.

• As similar to its past actions.

• As a higher level of violence and different behavior.

• As less aggressive than in 2008.

What is surprising about Russia's current geopolitical situation?

• Russia has improved its global image.

• Russia has become more isolated.

• Russia is almost cornered by the entire world.

• Russia has gained more allies.

What is questioned about Russia's current actions?

• The economic benefits of its actions.

• The calculated risks taken by Russia.

• The support from its allies.

• The environmental impact of its actions.