CLEAN : Trump supporters say the chaos in Chicago was not his fault

The transcript discusses the speaker's interesting qualities and the decision-making process regarding voting for him. It evaluates the speaker's responsibility in a disruptive event and considers the impact of events in Chicago, suggesting they may motivate people to vote.

What is the speaker's current stance on voting for the subject?

• The speaker is unaware of the voting process.

• The speaker is undecided about voting for him.

• The speaker is certain about voting for him.

• The speaker has decided not to vote for him.

Who does the speaker believe is responsible for the disruption?

• The subject himself

• The speaker

• The media

• People who came to disrupt

How does the speaker feel about the subject's involvement in the disruption?

• The speaker is unsure about the subject's involvement.

• The speaker thinks the subject planned the disruption.

• The speaker feels the subject is not at fault.

• The speaker feels the subject is to blame.

What does the speaker think about the events in Chicago?

• They will have no impact on the election.

• They will work in favor of the subject.

• They will motivate people to vote against the subject.

• They will be forgotten soon.

What is the speaker's prediction about voter motivation?

• Voters will be demotivated.

• Voters will be indifferent.

• Voters will be motivated to support the subject.

• Voters will be motivated to oppose the subject.