CLEAN : US-China climate pact is 'floor for action' but more needed: Greenpeace

The transcript discusses the importance of US-China engagement in addressing climate change. It emphasizes the need for both countries to increase their ambition and commitment beyond the current joint statement. The discussion highlights the necessity of translating political desire into multilateral action and recognizes climate change as a global issue affecting vulnerable countries. The transcript calls for a focus on domestic systems to support stronger climate action.

Why is it important for the two countries to remain engaged in climate discussions?

• To immediately solve the climate challenge

• To prevent disengagement and ensure ongoing commitment

• To introduce new ambitions immediately

• To focus solely on domestic issues

What should countries focus on when they return from international climate meetings?

• Reducing their international commitments

• Increasing their military budgets

• Ignoring political desires

• Finding stronger reasons to act on climate change domestically

How should political desire be translated according to the second section?

• Into domestic policies only

• Into economic sanctions

• Into bilateral agreements

• Into multilateral actions

Why is climate change considered a matter of life or death for some countries?

• Because it affects only the US and China

• Because it is a bilateral issue

• Because it is a minor environmental issue

• Because it severely impacts vulnerable countries

What is needed to address the global issue of climate change effectively?

• Increased ambition based on joint statements

• Ignoring vulnerable countries

• Less cooperation between countries

• Focus on economic growth only