CLEAN: DSK faces lesser standard of proof in civil

The video tutorial discusses the differences between civil and criminal cases, focusing on the standard of proof required in civil cases, which is the preponderance of evidence. It highlights the leniency in civil evidence rules compared to criminal cases and the potential for self-incrimination. The concept of diplomatic immunity is introduced, noting its complexity and potential impact on legal proceedings. The possibility of settlement is considered, with both parties having reasons to avoid a trial. The video concludes with a discussion on punitive damages and their role in civil cases.

What is the standard of proof required in civil cases?

• Clear and convincing evidence

• Beyond a reasonable doubt

• Absolute certainty

• Preponderance of the evidence

In a civil case, why might someone claim the privilege against self-incrimination?

• To avoid testifying in any case

• To prevent self-incrimination in a potential criminal case

• To avoid paying damages

• To delay the proceedings

What is diplomatic immunity?

• An exemption from paying taxes

• A waiver of all legal responsibilities

• A guarantee of a fair trial

• A legal protection for diplomats from lawsuits

Why might both parties consider settling a civil case?

• Because they have nothing to lose

• To avoid a lengthy trial

• To avoid media attention

• Due to weaknesses in their cases

What can influence the amount of punitive damages awarded?

• The number of witnesses

• The defendant's financial status

• The length of the trial

• The jury's perception of the case's severity