CLEAN : War crimes judges drop charges in Kenya Ruto case

The transcript discusses a decision that does not prevent future prosecution at the ICC or in national jurisdictions. It highlights the need to respect the decision, despite potential disappointment for victims. The transcript also addresses concerns about government interference in legal proceedings.

What does the decision discussed in the video allow for in the future?

• New prosecutions at ICC or national level

• Immediate enforcement of penalties

• Automatic appeal process

• Permanent closure of the case

Why might the decision be disappointing to victims?

• It involves a public apology

• It ensures a quick resolution

• It may not be appealed by victims

• It guarantees compensation

What is the expected reaction to the decision according to the video?

• It will be celebrated by all parties

• It will be ignored by the public

• It must be respected despite disappointment

• It will lead to immediate changes in law

What issue arises when a government advisor gives an opinion inconsistent with the law?

• Judicial independence

• Government interference

• Public support

• Legal clarity

What term is used to describe the involvement of a government advisor in the proceedings?

• Government interference

• Public consultation

• Legal advocacy

• Judicial oversight