AT&T Lawyer Says Merger Decision 'Sound and Proper'

The court has rejected the government's attempt to block a historic merger, highlighting the merger's benefits for consumers. Despite an 18-month process, the decision was based on facts and evidence, with the government unable to substantiate its theories. The merger's significance is unique to its context, and the court's decision underscores the lack of credible proof from the government.

What was the court's stance on the government's attempt to block the merger?

• The court was undecided on the matter.

• The court supported the government's attempt.

• The court rejected the government's attempt.

• The court postponed the decision.

How is the merger expected to impact consumers?

• It is expected to benefit consumers for generations.

• It will increase prices for consumers.

• It will limit consumer choices.

• It will have no impact.

What is the speaker's view on the significance of this transaction compared to others?

• This transaction is more significant than others.

• This transaction is less significant than others.

• Each transaction is unique and stands on its own.

• All transactions are the same.

On what basis did the court make its decision regarding the merger?

• Government's theories

• Facts and evidence presented at trial

• Media reports

• Public opinion

What was the outcome of the government's theories against the merger?

• They were supported by credible proof.

• They were accepted by the court.

• They lacked credible proof and were rejected.

• They were partially accepted.