Rishi Sunak says Tories' carrying out 'internal' probe into betting allegations

The video discusses the Gamblegate issue, focusing on the refusal to suspend Tory candidates amid investigations. It highlights the independence of the Gambling Commission and the Conservative Party's internal inquiries. The conversation shifts to the Institute for Fiscal Studies' critique of political manifestos, emphasizing the Conservative Party's plan for tax cuts funded by welfare budget savings. The speaker defends their manifesto as fully costed and challenges the opposition's stance on welfare spending.

What is the main reason given for not suspending Tory candidates in the Gamblegate issue?

• The candidates have already been cleared of all charges.

• The party believes the allegations are false.

• The investigations are independent and not controlled by the party.

• The candidates have resigned voluntarily.

What does the Institute for Fiscal Studies claim about political party manifestos?

• They are all fully transparent and accurate.

• They all focus too much on tax increases.

• None of them provide a complete picture of the facts.

• They are all identical in their proposals.

How does the speaker propose to fund tax cuts according to their manifesto?

• By cutting the education budget.

• By finding savings in the welfare budget.

• By increasing the national debt.

• By raising corporate taxes.

What does the speaker claim about the opposition's view on the welfare bill?

• They want to increase it further.

• They believe it can be reduced significantly.

• They think it is already too low.

• They don't think any savings can be made from it.

What is the speaker's stance on the welfare budget in relation to tax cuts?

• The welfare budget should be eliminated entirely.

• The welfare budget should remain unchanged.

• The welfare budget should be constrained to enable tax cuts.

• The welfare budget should be increased to support more people.