Assange team speaking outside the Court

The transcript discusses a decision welcomed as a positive step, though not sufficient. It highlights the historical significance of the case, its implications for journalism and press freedom, and the urgent situation of Julian Assange, emphasizing concerns about his health and safety in Belmarsh prison. The transcript calls for the US government to drop charges against Assange and end the legal process, urging continued monitoring of proceedings.

What is the significance of the decision mentioned in the first section?

• It is a negative step for press freedom.

• It has no impact on journalism.

• It is a final resolution to the case.

• It is a step in the right direction but not sufficient.

What is the role of the Supreme Court in this case?

• To impose new charges.

• To expedite the extradition process.

• To review the case as it is of historical significance.

• To ignore the appeal.

Why is Julian Assange's situation described as urgent?

• He is in perfect health.

• He has serious health concerns, including a mini-stroke and COVID-19 risks.

• He has been released from prison.

• He is facing new charges.

What action does Reporters Without Borders urge the US government to take?

• To continue the legal process.

• To increase charges against Assange.

• To extradite Assange to another country.

• To drop the charges and close the case.

What is the main focus of the campaign by Reporters Without Borders?

• To campaign for Assange's freedom and monitor legal proceedings.

• To ensure Assange remains in prison.

• To support the charges against Assange.

• To stop all media coverage of the case.