CLEAN : PNG court rejects bid to restore Australia refugee camp services

The transcript discusses the plight of men facing threats and legal breaches in PNG. Despite a court decision, the PNG and Australian governments have not restored services, leaving the men desperate and fearful. The lack of ongoing support exacerbates their fears, especially with local attacks. An offer of help was rejected by the Australian government, crushing the men's hopes.

What was the main argument regarding the breach of PNG's constitution?

• Poor healthcare services

• Threats to personal safety

• Lack of food and water

• Inadequate housing

What can the PNG and Australian governments do despite the court decision?

• Ignore the refugees

• Relocate the refugees

• Provide financial aid

• Restore services

Why did the opportunity for court enforcement get missed?

• Refugees' withdrawal of the case

• Government intervention

• Court's inability to act

• Lack of evidence

What was the emotional state of the refugees after the rejection of help?

• Angry

• Hopeful

• Indifferent

• Devastated

What did the refugees experience over a number of years?

• Increased support from locals

• Improved living conditions

• Successful integration

• Repeated attacks