WEB-POLAND-WALESA-POLITICS-HISTORY

The transcript discusses a revived debate sparked by a new book alleging that a former leader of the Solidarity Trade Union in Poland was a police informer in the 1970s. The book claims he provided information on strike organizers and received compensation for his services. The accused, Valisa, denies these allegations, emphasizing the complexity of their struggle against communism. Critics argue the book serves as propaganda for the Kaszynski brothers, who have a contentious history with Valisa. Despite the controversy, many believe the allegations do not diminish Valisa's historical significance.

What is the main accusation made against the former leader of the Solidarity Trade Union in the new book?

• He led a violent uprising.

• He was involved in financial fraud.

• He collaborated with foreign governments.

• He was a police informer in the 1970s.

How does Valisa respond to the accusations made in the book?

• He remains silent on the matter.

• He denies the accusations.

• He blames a third party.

• He admits to the accusations.

What do critics claim about the book's purpose?

• It is a factual historical account.

• It is propaganda for the Kaszynski brothers.

• It is a scientific analysis.

• It is a fictional story.

What is the relationship between Valisa and the Kaszynski brothers?

• They have never interacted.

• They have a long and bitter history.

• They have always been allies.

• They are family members.

How do most polls view Valisa's historical role despite the book's allegations?

• It is completely tarnished.

• It remains unaffected.

• It is greatly enhanced.

• It is slightly diminished.