CLEAN : Scotland's highest court delays decision on Boris Johnson Brexit letter

The video discusses the legal proceedings involving the Prime Minister's compliance with the Ben Act. It highlights the role of the courts in ensuring adherence to legal obligations and the questionable nature of letters sent to Brussels. The courts are tasked with deciding on the Prime Minister's actions, and there is an emphasis on the necessity for compliance and the avoidance of frustrating the process. Legal advisors are expected to guide the Prime Minister in adhering to the Ben Act's principles.

What was the role of Balfour Manson in the legal proceedings?

• They were the prosecutor in the case.

• They were the defendant in the case.

• They were the solicitor involved in the case.

• They were the judge overseeing the case.

What was the main objective of the courts in this legal case?

• To delay the proceedings indefinitely.

• To support the Prime Minister's actions.

• To ensure the Prime Minister complies with the Ben Act.

• To dismiss the case entirely.

Why were the letters sent to Brussels considered questionable?

• They were sent to the wrong address.

• Their content was unclear and raised legal concerns.

• They were not signed by the Prime Minister.

• They were not sent on time.

What did the senior counsel for the Prime Minister assure?

• That the Prime Minister would seek to frustrate the process.

• That the Prime Minister would abide by the Ben Act.

• That the Prime Minister would ignore the Ben Act.

• That the Prime Minister would resign.

What is the role of the Prime Minister's legal advisers?

• To provide careful legal advice regarding compliance with the Ben Act.

• To encourage the Prime Minister to break the law.

• To represent the Prime Minister in court.

• To draft new legislation.