Brexit Party standing down candidates 'to stop Lib Dems getting in', says Farage

The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the Brussels deal and discusses the Prime Minister's new direction towards a Super Canada plus trade deal. The Brexit Party's decision is framed as being in the national interest, considering past election dynamics where UKIP influenced Labour votes. The speaker emphasizes the importance of trust in leadership and warns of political consequences if promises are broken. The closing remarks reflect on the political landscape and upcoming elections.

What was the speaker's initial reaction to the deal from Brussels?

• They were pleased with the deal.

• They were confused about the deal.

• They absolutely hated the deal.

• They were indifferent to the deal.

What change in strategy did the Prime Minister signal?

• Increasing tariffs on imports.

• Strengthening ties with the European Union.

• Negotiating a free trade deal similar to Super Canada plus.

• A move towards political alignment.

Why did the Brexit Party decide to prioritize national interest?

• To avoid political backlash.

• Because it was believed to be the right decision for the country.

• To align with the Liberal Democrats.

• To gain more seats in the House of Commons.

What historical event does the speaker reference to explain potential election outcomes?

• The 2010 General Election.

• The 2015 Conservative victory in Labour seats.

• The 2005 Labour landslide.

• The 2017 snap election.

What is the speaker's hope regarding the reaction of party members?

• That they will leave the party.

• That they will trust the speaker's judgment.

• That they will protest the decision.

• That they will demand a leadership change.