Credit Suisse Says CEO Had No Knowledge of Spying

The transcript discusses the backstory and context of issues related to Credit Suisse, focusing on the truthfulness of initial responses to allegations of spying and surveillance. It highlights the company's statements made in good faith, the emergence of new allegations involving the HR chief, and the perceived inadequacy of the investigation into corporate culture. The Swiss regulator FINMA's involvement is also noted, with Credit Suisse's commitment to cooperate, despite facing challenging questions.

What was the initial reaction of the individuals involved in the Credit Suisse incident when questioned about the wider context?

• They were completely honest.

• They did not respond truthfully.

• They provided detailed explanations.

• They refused to answer.

How did Credit Suisse describe the incident earlier this year?

• As a common practice.

• As an isolated incident.

• As a widespread issue.

• As a minor error.

What new information did Credit Suisse claim to have learned through the media?

• The legal consequences of the incident.

• The identity of the whistleblower.

• The financial impact of the incident.

• The involvement of the HR chief.

What does the observer suggest about the investigation into the Credit Suisse incident?

• It was thorough and complete.

• It was too aggressive.

• It did not go deep enough.

• It was unnecessary.

Which regulatory body is looking into the Credit Suisse incident more intently?

• The Federal Reserve.

• The European Central Bank.

• The Swiss regulator, FINMA.

• The International Monetary Fund.