National Rail at fault for girls deaths

The transcript discusses a tragic accident at a railway crossing in 2005, where two girls, Charlotte and Olivia, were initially blamed for their own deaths. It later emerged that Network Rail had prior knowledge of safety risks at the crossing. The company has since apologized and taken steps to improve safety, but recent incidents highlight ongoing concerns. The families seek transparency and accountability from Network Rail.

What was the initial reaction of Network Rail regarding the accident involving Charlotte and Olivia?

• They claimed it was an unavoidable accident.

• They blamed the train driver.

• They blamed the girls for their own deaths.

• They accepted full responsibility.

What did the documents that emerged six years after the accident reveal?

• Network Rail had no prior knowledge of any risks.

• The accident was caused by a technical failure.

• The crossing was deemed completely safe.

• There were known safety risks at the crossing.

What action did Network Rail take in response to the safety concerns?

• They closed over 500 level crossings.

• They increased train speeds.

• They reduced the number of trains.

• They ignored the concerns.

What recent event occurred on the same stretch of track?

• A new train service was launched.

• The track was closed permanently.

• Another teenager was killed in a similar accident.

• A new safety system was installed.

What is Charlotte's father's main request following the recent accident?

• To receive financial compensation.

• To have the crossing permanently closed.

• To be treated with transparency and honesty.

• To have a memorial built at the site.