CLEAN : UN warns of consequences if Afghanistan aid delayed

The video discusses the urgent need for states to disburse financial pledges to prevent a humanitarian crisis and potential displacement in Afghanistan. It highlights the dangers of exporting asylum obligations and the importance of upholding commitments made at the Global Refugee Forum to share responsibility for refugee protection.

What is the main concern regarding the pledges made by states?

• They have been fully disbursed.

• They are not needed anymore.

• They have not been disbursed yet.

• They are too small to make a difference.

What could be a consequence of not disbursing the pledged resources?

• Improved healthcare in Afghanistan.

• Increased international trade.

• Massive displacement of people.

• Stability in the region.

Why might people move outside of Afghanistan according to the speaker?

• To seek better education opportunities.

• To explore new cultures.

• Due to lack of healthcare and basic resources.

• To find new employment.

What is the speaker's view on Australia's approach to asylum seekers?

• It is beneficial for refugees.

• It is a temporary solution.

• It is a betrayal of international commitments.

• It is a model for other countries.

What does the speaker believe about exporting asylum obligations?

• It is a safe practice.

• It strengthens the refugee protection regime.

• It is dangerous for refugee protection.

• It is a cost-effective solution.