China's State Funds Said to Intervene in Stock Market

The video discusses the recent absence of certain market players and the perceived bubble in specific sectors. As the market showed signs of instability, the government decided to intervene, especially during the NPC event. The market correction was marked by technical indicators falling below key levels, prompting government action to prevent further instability. The government's intervention, particularly through Hong Kong's stock links, highlights their concern over potential market instability.

What was the market's reaction to the belief that certain sectors had entered a bubble?

• They decided to exit the market completely.

• They ignored the bubble concerns.

• They were happy to see excess froth removed.

• They were eager to invest more.

Why did the government decide to intervene in the market during the NPC event?

• To encourage more investment.

• To introduce new market regulations.

• To stop the market from rising too quickly.

• To prevent further market decline and instability.

What was a significant technical indicator that caused concern in the market?

• The CSI 300 rising above 6000.

• The 100-day moving average being surpassed.

• The CSI 300 falling below 5000.

• The market reaching an all-time high.

How did the government intervene in the market to address instability?

• By buying stocks through Hong Kong links.

• By imposing new taxes on traders.

• By selling government bonds.

• By increasing interest rates.

What was the government's stance on market intervention before the recent instability?

• They were highly interventionist.

• They preferred a hands-off approach.

• They frequently adjusted market regulations.

• They were indifferent to market changes.