CLEAN : Lawyers in R. Kelly case clash over calling accusers groupies

The transcript discusses a legal case involving Mr. Kelly, focusing on the portrayal of victims, defense strategies, and the implications of changing perceptions over time. It highlights the legal proceedings in New York and Chicago, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges and the potential risks if Mr. Kelly were released. The defense's portrayal of victims as 'groupies' is criticized, and the need to evaluate past events through the lens of their time is stressed. The transcript concludes with the legal team's plans to appeal the court's decision.

How does the speaker describe the victims in contrast to being labeled as 'groupies'?

• As individuals seeking fame

• As brave victims seeking justice

• As individuals with no real grievances

• As people looking for attention

What does the speaker suggest about the defense's statements regarding the victims?

• They are completely accurate

• They are meant to provoke a reaction

• They are supportive of the victims

• They are irrelevant to the case

Why does the speaker agree with the court's order regarding Mr. Kelly?

• Because Mr. Kelly is not a danger to the community

• Because Mr. Kelly has no legal representation

• Because Mr. Kelly is a flight risk

• Because Mr. Kelly is innocent

What is the speaker's view on how past events should be evaluated?

• Based on personal opinions

• Based on current societal norms

• Through today's lens

• Through the lens of the time they occurred

What legal actions are being taken following the court's decision?

• No further actions

• Filing motions and appeals

• Accepting the decision without contest

• Requesting a retrial