Court Rules The DOJ Can Withhold Grants From 'Sanctuary Jurisdictions'

The DOJ announced it would withhold policing grants from sanctuary jurisdictions unless they cooperated with federal immigration authorities. Several states sued, challenging these requirements. A recent ruling overturned previous court decisions, supporting the DOJ's stance. This decision is part of a broader conflict over immigration policies under the Trump administration. Despite this ruling, other courts have ruled against the DOJ, suggesting states might resist compliance.

What was the main condition set by the DOJ in 2017 for states to receive policing grants?

• States must increase their police force.

• States must implement new immigration laws.

• States must reduce crime rates.

• States must share information about undocumented immigrants.

Which states were involved in suing the DOJ over the grant requirements?

• New York and Connecticut

• Florida and Georgia

• California and Texas

• Ohio and Michigan

What did the recent court ruling affirm regarding the DOJ's authority?

• The Attorney General has the authority to enforce grant conditions.

• The DOJ must provide grants without conditions.

• The DOJ cannot set any conditions for grants.

• States have the right to refuse federal grant conditions.

What recent action was taken against New Yorkers in relation to federal immigration policies?

• They were exempted from federal immigration laws.

• They received increased federal funding.

• They were barred from trusted traveler programs.

• They were granted additional travel privileges.

How have other federal appeals courts ruled in similar cases against the DOJ?

• They have not taken any stance.

• They have delayed their rulings.

• They have consistently supported the DOJ.

• They have ruled against the DOJ.