CLEAN : India's top court bans Islamic instant divorce: reax

CLEAN : India's top court bans Islamic instant divorce: reax

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Religious Studies

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The Supreme Court of India ruled that triple talaq is unconstitutional, marking a significant step towards gender justice for Muslim women. Previously, Muslim women could be divorced arbitrarily, but now men must adhere to Koranic injunctions. The decision, although not unanimous, requires Parliament to enact further laws. Historically, the issue was not addressed due to the absence of affected individuals challenging it in court.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What significant change did the Supreme Court's verdict on triple talaq bring about for Muslim women?

It required women to seek permission for divorce.

It mandated government approval for divorce.

It made triple talaq unconstitutional.

It allowed women to initiate divorce.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the next step after the Supreme Court's decision on triple talaq?

The decision needs to be ratified by the President.

The decision is final and requires no further action.

The decision will be reviewed by a higher court.

The Parliament must enact further laws.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why was the Supreme Court's decision on triple talaq not unanimous?

The judges had differing opinions.

There was a lack of evidence.

The case was not presented properly.

The decision was made in haste.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the term 'glass ceiling' refer to in the context of the triple talaq verdict?

A type of court ruling.

A religious injunction.

A legal term for divorce.

A barrier to women's rights.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a major reason the Supreme Court had not addressed the triple talaq issue earlier?

The judges were not available.

There was no affected individual challenging it.

The issue was not considered important.

The court was waiting for a government directive.