CLEAN : Polanski rape victim pleads with judge to close 1977 case

The speaker addresses questions and shares personal experiences, highlighting the difference between public perception and personal reality. They reflect on the trauma and empathy experienced, emphasizing that the situation was not as traumatic as perceived. The speaker also discusses the impact of public opinion on individuals involved and considers future implications.

What does the speaker suggest about their approach to public perception?

• They prefer to hide from the public.

• They rely on their attorney to handle public matters.

• They believe in avoiding public attention.

• They are open and unafraid to face the public.

How does the speaker describe their past experience?

• As something they have completely forgotten.

• As a unique and terrifying event.

• As a common experience that was not very traumatic.

• As extremely traumatic and uncommon.

What is the speaker's attitude towards the criticism faced by another individual?

• They are indifferent to the criticism.

• They empathize with the individual facing criticism.

• They believe the criticism is justified.

• They are unaware of the criticism.

What does the speaker anticipate might happen if a public figure wins another award?

• They will be forgotten by the public.

• They will be celebrated by the public.

• They will receive more awards.

• They will face increased public scrutiny.

How does the speaker feel about the potential impact on their family due to public perception?

• They believe it will have no impact.

• They think it will positively influence their family.

• They are unconcerned about the impact.

• They are worried about the negative introduction to public perception for their family.