CLEAN: Analyst comments on Turkey's reaction to genocide denial bill

The transcript discusses the lack of debate in Turkey regarding the Armenian Genocide, contrasting it with the situation in France. It highlights the Turkish government's reaction to international pressure, including potential sanctions and boycotts, and the limitations imposed by trade agreements like the WTO and EU customs union. The speaker hopes for a more constructive approach as the centenary of the Armenian Genocide approaches. The transcript also notes Turkey's increasing confidence over the years, which has led to a harsher response to these issues.

What is the main reason for the lack of debate in Turkey about the Armenian Genocide?

• There is a lack of proper information and understanding.

• There is a strong consensus on the events.

• The events are not considered significant.

• The government has banned discussions.

What is Turkey's proposed response to international pressure regarding the Armenian Genocide?

• To apologize for past events.

• To seek diplomatic solutions.

• To impose permanent sanctions and boycotts.

• To ignore the pressure completely.

What international agreement limits Turkey's ability to impose sanctions?

• The NATO Agreement

• The European Union Treaty

• The World Trade Organization rules

• The United Nations Charter

How has Turkey's confidence changed from 2001 to 2012?

• It has become more confident, even overconfident.

• It has remained the same.

• It has decreased significantly.

• It has become more cautious.

What is the result of Turkey's increased confidence according to the transcript?

• A harsher reaction.

• A more diplomatic approach.

• A focus on economic growth.

• A withdrawal from international agreements.