Appellate Court Role - Procedural Review

The video explains the roles of trial and appellate courts in the judicial system. Trial courts apply the law to cases, while appellate courts review these applications for errors in law or constitutionality. The video discusses how appellate courts ensure the correct application of substantive and procedural laws, and their ability to reverse or remand cases if errors are found. It also highlights the rare instances of de Novo review, where appellate courts consider new evidence.

What is the primary role of a trial court in the judicial system?

• To conduct de Novo reviews

• To apply the law to cases and resolve disputes

• To review the constitutionality of laws

• To create new laws

What does the appellate court primarily check for when reviewing a trial court's decision?

• Errors in the application of the law and constitutionality

• The fairness of the trial

• The efficiency of the trial process

• The popularity of the decision

How does the appellate court ensure the substantive law was applied correctly?

• By conducting a new trial

• By reviewing legislative notes and prior applications

• By polling the jury

• By consulting with the trial judge

What can the appellate court do if it finds that procedural law was not applied correctly?

• Dismiss the case entirely

• Change the law

• Impose a fine on the trial court

• Remand the case back to the trial court

In what rare situation does the appellate court conduct a de Novo review?

• When the law is unclear

• When the jury is unavailable

• When the trial court requests it

• When new evidence is presented