CLEAN : Twitter blocked by Trump? Judge hears free speech case

Dan discusses being blocked by the president on social media, expressing initial outrage and pride. He highlights the impact on his political engagement and the broader issue of viewpoint discrimination. Dan argues that blocking critics violates the 1st amendment and seeks a resolution where the president stops blocking people based on their viewpoints, suggesting muting as an alternative.

What was the speaker's initial feeling after being blocked by the president?

• Outrage followed by pride

• Confusion

• Indifference

• Happiness

How did being blocked affect the speaker's political engagement?

• It had no effect

• It increased their visibility

• It improved their relationship with the president

• It impaired their ability to engage with fellow citizens

What does the speaker believe is the consequence of being blocked on social media?

• It increases the number of followers

• It has no impact on public engagement

• It limits the ability to gather information and participate in conversations

• It enhances public discourse

What is the speaker's argument regarding the president's use of an official account?

• Blocking critics is a form of viewpoint discrimination

• It should be used for personal opinions only

• It should not be used for any public communication

• It should be private and not accessible to the public

What resolution does the speaker seek regarding the president's blocking of critics?

• To increase the number of blocked users

• To delete the official account

• To stop blocking people based on their viewpoints

• To allow blocking based on personal preference