Djokovic Departs Australia After Losing Visa Battle

The transcript discusses Novak Djokovic's deportation from Australia and the three-year ban on reentry. It highlights the minister's discretion in both deportation and potential return under special circumstances. The court upheld the deportation, citing concerns about Djokovic's influence on anti-vaccine sentiments. The context of Melbourne's strict lockdown and high vaccination rates is emphasized, with government officials praising the decision as a tribute to vaccinated Australians.

What is the duration of the ban imposed on Novak Djokovic from reentering Australia?

• Three years

• Two years

• One year

• Five years

What was the main reason the government wanted to deport Djokovic?

• He was a high-profile anti-vaccine skeptic

• He violated quarantine rules

• He overstayed his visa

• He committed a crime

What did Djokovic's lawyers argue about the impact of his deportation?

• It would improve public health

• It would reduce anti-vaccine sentiment

• It would have no impact

• It would likely increase anti-vaccine sentiment

What percentage of Melbourne's population was vaccinated at the time of the Australian Open?

• 85%

• 93%

• 90%

• 95%

Who praised the court's decision as a tribute to vaccinated Australians?

• The Prime Minister

• The Health Minister

• The Home Affairs Minister

• The Sports Minister