Naomi Long: Issues with NI protocol do not justify 'egregious breach of international law'

The transcript discusses the egregious breach of international law by the government, driven by the DUP, and the need for institutional reform to prevent political parties from holding institutions to ransom. It highlights the importance of addressing legacy issues, which breach international norms and trust, and interfere with Northern Ireland's justice system. The speaker emphasizes the need for robust opposition to the proposed bill. Additionally, the transcript covers recent political engagements, contrasting the current British government's unilateral actions with the potential for improved Anglo-Irish relations through dialogue and cooperation.

What is the main reason for the government's breach of international law according to the first section?

• Pressure from the DUP

• International pressure

• Public demand

• Economic benefits

What is the proposed solution to prevent parties from holding institutions hostage?

• Enhancing economic policies

• Increasing public awareness

• Reforming legislative institutions

• Strengthening international relations

How is the issue of legacy described in the second section?

• A minor legal adjustment

• A breach of international norms and trust

• An economic challenge

• A political opportunity

What is the stance of the opposition towards the proposed bill on legacy?

• Indifferent

• Supportive with minor changes

• Neutral

• Strongly opposed

What is emphasized as crucial for resolving issues in the final section?

• Military intervention

• Economic sanctions

• Unilateral actions

• Dialogue and cooperation