Obstruction Now A Major Focus In Trump Documents Probe

The video discusses a legal case involving the Justice Department and former President Trump, focusing on whether a special master should be appointed to review materials seized from Mar-a-lago. Trump's legal team argues for the appointment, citing concerns over attorney-client privilege, while the Justice Department opposes it, emphasizing obstruction and national security risks. Legal experts question the necessity of a special master, and the White House maintains a neutral stance to avoid political interference. Both parties agree on submitting proposals for a special master if appointed, with a hearing scheduled in West Palm Beach.

What is the main reason Trump's legal team is requesting a special master?

• To challenge the legality of the FBI search

• To gain public support

• To expedite the investigation process

• To ensure the review of potentially privileged documents

According to the Justice Department, why does Trump lack standing to request a special master?

• The documents are considered U.S. property

• The documents are irrelevant to the investigation

• The documents have already been declassified

• The documents are not related to national security

What is the Justice Department's main concern regarding the appointment of a special master?

• It would delay the investigation

• It would increase public scrutiny

• It would lead to document leaks

• It would require additional resources

What is the White House's position on the investigation?

• They are actively involved

• They are opposing the Justice Department

• They are supporting Trump's legal team

• They are ensuring non-interference

What do both parties agree on if a special master is appointed?

• The special master should be appointed by the President

• The special master should be from the Justice Department

• The special master should have top security clearance

• The special master should be a former judge