Laurence Tribe on How Obamacare Could Unravel

The transcript discusses the King vs. Burwell case, a significant test for the Affordable Care Act, focusing on Chief Justice John Roberts' potential decision-making process. It explores the implications of different outcomes, Roberts' past decisions, and his motivations. The discussion highlights the complexity of the case and the potential impact on the law, emphasizing Roberts' concern for the long-term implications and historical significance of his decisions.

What is the central focus of the King versus Burwell case?

• The historical significance of the Affordable Care Act

• The impact of federal mandates on state governments

• The role of John Roberts in the Supreme Court

• The legality of the Affordable Care Act

How does the Chief Justice describe the federal government's approach to states in the context of the Affordable Care Act?

• As a fair negotiation

• As a coercive proposition

• As a collaborative effort

• As a beneficial partnership

What makes predicting Justice Roberts' decision challenging?

• His unpredictable voting history

• The potential for cataclysmic impact

• His lack of experience

• The complexity of the Affordable Care Act

What was Justice Roberts' reasoning for upholding the individual purchase mandate previously?

• To protect the institution

• To align with public opinion

• To avoid a cataclysmic impact

• To gain favor with other justices

What does Justice Roberts prioritize in his judicial decisions?

• Personal beliefs

• Long-term historical impact

• Short-term political gains

• Public opinion