Towards a Civilized Discussion

Franz Duvall expresses frustration with both fundamentalists and neo atheists, as he believes they hinder open discussions on morality's origins and role in society. He critiques fundamentalists for rejecting evolution and neo atheists for their aggressive stance. Duvall advocates for calm, respectful dialogue to explore morality and religion's societal roles.

What is Franz Duvall's main concern regarding fundamentalists and neo-atheists?

• They both agree on the role of religion in society.

• They both support evolutionary theory.

• They both prevent open discussions about morality.

• They both have a positive impact on scientific discourse.

Why does Franz Duvall find it difficult to work with fundamentalists?

• They support neo-atheist views.

• They oppose evolutionary theory.

• They are open to scientific theories.

• They reject the written words of religious texts.

What proportion of believers, according to Duvall, are open to science and evolutionary theory?

• All believers

• Two thirds

• Half

• One third

What is Duvall's criticism of neo-atheists?

• They are too aggressive and dismissive.

• They avoid discussions about morality.

• They support fundamentalist views.

• They are too accommodating to believers.

What does Duvall suggest as a better approach for neo-atheists?

• To engage in respectful dialogue.

• To avoid discussions about religion.

• To convert believers to atheism.

• To continue being aggressive.