Jeremy Corbyn Reacts to Syria Strikes

The transcript discusses the lack of parliamentary consultation before military strikes, questioning the legal basis and urging for transparency. It highlights the need for UN involvement and a new resolution to address the Syrian conflict. The speaker warns against unilateral actions without legal backing, emphasizing the role of the UN as a mediator. The humanitarian justification for the strikes is debated, with historical precedents cited as alternatives. The legality of the bombing is questioned, focusing on the absence of a direct threat to justify self-defense.

Why does the speaker believe Parliament should have been consulted before the strikes?

• To allow Parliament to express its views

• To ensure military readiness

• To follow international law

• To gain public support

What role does the speaker suggest the United Nations should play in the Syrian conflict?

• To provide military support

• To lead humanitarian aid efforts

• To act as an honest broker

• To impose economic sanctions

According to the speaker, what is a consequence of countries taking unilateral military action?

• It ensures global peace

• It leads to economic growth

• It strengthens international alliances

• It encourages other countries to do the same

What argument does the speaker make against the legality of the airstrikes?

• They were not approved by the United Nations

• They were not supported by allies

• They were not based on self-defense

• They were not financially viable

What past diplomatic effort does the speaker reference as a precedent for resolving chemical weapons issues?

• The Paris Agreement

• The Lavrov-Kerry Agreement

• The Geneva Convention

• The Oslo Accords