CLEAN: Kim Dot ComÕs Lawyer says his client is 'very relieved'

The transcript discusses a situation involving Mr. Eichel and a case lacking substantial basis. It covers the extradition process, preparation for hearings, and concerns about internet access restrictions. The discussion emphasizes the need for thorough analysis and preparation.

What did Mr. Eichel and the speaker observe during their visit?

• The person refused to meet them.

• The person was coping with uncomfortable conditions.

• The person was living in luxury.

• The person was not present during their visit.

What is the speaker's main argument about the case presented?

• It lacks substantial basis.

• It has a strong basis.

• It is not related to extradition.

• It is already resolved.

What is the next step mentioned regarding the US government's request?

• To ignore the request.

• To immediately approve the request.

• To wait for the request and prepare for the hearing.

• To reject the request without consideration.

How does the speaker compare internet access?

• To having access to a library.

• To having access to a car.

• To having access to a telephone.

• To having access to a television.

What is emphasized about online submissions?

• They should be ignored.

• They should be restricted.

• They should be delayed.

• They should not be interfered with.