CLEAN : Macron reforms unleash mass strikes, protests reax in English

The transcript discusses the importance of democracy and respecting votes while expressing concerns about the government's approach to privatizing essential services. It highlights the efficiency of public management, particularly in train services, and compares the situation in France with England. The speaker advocates for change without violence and stresses the significance of public service workers in maintaining the country's well-being.

What is the speaker's main concern about the elected official?

• The official is focusing too much on public services.

• The official is not respecting democratic votes.

• The official is using power to harm citizens' lives.

• The official is not making any changes.

Why does the speaker prefer some services to be publicly managed?

• Public management allows for more innovation.

• Public management is proven to be more efficient.

• Public management is less bureaucratic.

• Public management is more cost-effective.

What comparison does the speaker make regarding train services?

• France's train services should avoid becoming like England's.

• England's train services are more privatized than France's.

• France's train services are less efficient than England's.

• England's train services are a model for France.

What is the speaker's stance on change?

• Change should be rapid and aggressive.

• Change is unnecessary in the 21st century.

• Change is necessary but should not be violent.

• Change should be avoided at all costs.

What does the speaker believe about the role of public service workers?

• They are only needed in certain sectors.

• They are essential for the country's well-being.

• They are unnecessary in modern society.

• They should be replaced by private companies.