Change of approach in net zero policies could save families £15,000 a year, claims PM

Change of approach in net zero policies could save families £15,000 a year, claims PM

Assessment

Interactive Video

Created by

Quizizz Content

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

The video discusses the UK's commitment to achieving Net Zero by 2050, emphasizing the need for a pragmatic and honest approach. It highlights the political and economic challenges, particularly the financial burden on families, and stresses the importance of a fair and proportionate strategy. The speaker addresses criticisms and outlines cost-saving measures to ensure public consent and minimize resistance.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's proposed approach to achieving net zero by 2050?

Focusing solely on technological advancements

Ignoring the net zero target altogether

A strict and immediate implementation of all policies

A pragmatic and realistic approach that eases burdens on families

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker believe is the only realistic path to achieving net zero?

A democratic approach with honesty and pragmatism

Imposing strict regulations without public consent

Ignoring economic implications

Relying solely on technological innovations

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the speaker plan to address the resistance faced in implementing their policies?

By ensuring the approach is fair and proportionate

By making short-term decisions to appease critics

By ignoring the resistance and proceeding with the plan

By abandoning the net zero target

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why does the speaker emphasize the need for a fair approach to net zero?

To ensure the policies are implemented quickly

To avoid any form of resistance

To minimize the financial impact on families

To gain international recognition

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's stance on the financial burden of proposed energy policies?

They suggest delaying all energy policies indefinitely

They argue for a balanced approach to minimize financial burdens

They believe the costs are justified and necessary

They think the costs should be borne by the government