TUV's Jim Allister says there is "no need" for an Irish Language Act

The transcript discusses the Irish Language Act, contrasting it with the need for other language acts like French or Spanish. It highlights the significant funding the Irish language sector has received and questions the political motives behind the demand for more. The act is seen as a political tool to make Northern Ireland less comfortable for Unionists, urging them to stand firm against it.

Why does the speaker argue against the need for an Irish Language Act?

• Because it is not commercially useful

• Because there are no acts for other languages like French or Spanish

• Because it is too expensive

• Because it is not popular among the public

What is highlighted about the Irish language sector in terms of support?

• It is funded by private investors

• It has no financial support

• It is supported by international organizations

• It has received over £200 million in funding

What is the speaker's view on the continuous demand for more resources for the Irish language sector?

• It is a temporary situation

• It is justified due to lack of support

• It is unnecessary given the existing support

• It is a result of international pressure

What political agenda is associated with the Irish Language Act according to the speaker?

• Enhancing economic growth

• Deep British sizing of the north

• Promoting cultural diversity

• Improving educational standards

What advice does the speaker give to Unionists regarding the Irish Language Act?

• To support the act

• To negotiate terms

• To seek international support

• To stand firm and not concede