The Supreme Court Vacancy Is A Key Point In Courting Voters

The transcript discusses the complexities of filling a Supreme Court seat close to an election, highlighting the potential impact on the election if the confirmation process is not completed. It compares the current situation to 2016 when Merrick Garland was blocked by a Republican-controlled Senate, emphasizing the different political dynamics now with Republicans controlling both the Senate and the White House.

What is one of the main effects of attempting to fill a Supreme Court seat close to an election?

• It energizes both political parties.

• It leads to immediate confirmation.

• It has no impact on the election.

• It decreases voter turnout.

What could happen if the Supreme Court vacancy is not filled before the election?

• The Senate gains more power over the election.

• The election results could be delayed indefinitely.

• The Supreme Court could face a tie in major election cases.

• The President automatically wins the election.

How did the Supreme Court influence the 2000 election?

• By increasing voter registration.

• By delaying the election process.

• By deciding the outcome of the election.

• By appointing a new justice.

What was the Republican argument for blocking Merrick Garland's nomination in 2016?

• The nomination was too close to the election.

• The President was not eligible to nominate.

• The Senate was controlled by Democrats.

• There was a divided government.

What is the current Republican stance on filling the Supreme Court vacancy?

• They argue that they have the right to confirm due to unified government control.

• They want to wait for bipartisan support.

• They are undecided on the process.

• They believe it should be postponed until after the election.