Facebook Can't Eliminate All Hate Speech, VP Nick Clegg Says

The transcript discusses Facebook's efforts to combat voter suppression and hate speech, highlighting the company's collaboration with civil rights organizations. It addresses the challenges of eliminating hate speech entirely and responds to criticism about potentially profiting from inflammatory content. The transcript also covers ongoing policy changes, the role of Facebook in public debates, and the technological advances in content moderation. It emphasizes the company's commitment to minimizing hate speech while acknowledging the inherent challenges.

What percentage of hate speech does Facebook claim to remove before it is reported?

• 90%

• 70%

• 100%

• 50%

Why does Facebook believe it is held to a different standard compared to other platforms?

• Due to its lack of policies

• Due to its significant role in societal debates

• Because it is a public company

• Because it has fewer users

What is Facebook's stance on profiting from hate speech?

• They profit significantly from it

• They have no incentive to allow it

• They encourage it for more engagement

• They are indifferent to it

What type of content does Facebook claim to benefit from?

• Negative and divisive content

• Positive human connection

• Unverified news stories

• Controversial political debates

What is the purpose of Facebook's largest voter information effort?

• To discourage voting

• To promote political ads

• To provide authoritative voting information

• To influence voter decisions

How does Facebook plan to address posts related to voting during the COVID pandemic?

• By attaching links to authoritative information

• By removing all such posts

• By ignoring them

• By promoting them for more engagement

What is the nature of Facebook's work with civil rights leaders?

• A secretive operation

• A completed project

• An ongoing iterative process

• A one-time consultation