SCM Direct’s Gina Miller: Ready to Launch Legal Action Against Parliament Suspension

The transcript discusses potential legal action against the UK government regarding prorogation of Parliament, highlighting constitutional concerns. Gina Miller emphasizes the importance of non-partisan legal processes and her decision not to run for political office. The role of the monarchy in political decisions is examined, and the Labour Party's stance on a second referendum is analyzed, revealing internal divisions.

What was the main reason for the speaker's legal team to consider action against the government?

• To support John Major's stance

• To challenge the legality of proroguing Parliament

• To align with other political parties

• To ensure a no-deal Brexit

What is the primary concern regarding the use of proroguing Parliament?

• It strengthens the Prime Minister's power

• It could be used to bypass important parliamentary debates

• It is a common practice every year

• It is a new addition to the Constitution

Why does the speaker prefer not to run for political office?

• They lack interest in politics

• They are waiting for a better opportunity

• They want to remain non-partisan

• They are aligned with the Liberal Democrats

What is the difference between proroguing and dissolving Parliament?

• Proroguing is permanent, dissolving is temporary

• Proroguing is a yearly ritual, dissolving happens during elections

• Proroguing is illegal, dissolving is not

• Proroguing involves the Queen, dissolving does not

What is the speaker's view on the likelihood of a second referendum?

• Highly likely

• Almost certain

• Almost zero

• Dependent on the Labour Party

What internal issue does the Labour Party face according to the speaker?

• Lack of leadership

• Deep divisions between elected members and the NEC

• Financial difficulties

• Inability to decide on Brexit

What would be the consequence if the Queen declined a Prime Minister's request to prorogue Parliament?

• It would strengthen the monarchy's role

• It would lead to a constitutional crisis

• It would make the Queen an active political figure

• It would dissolve Parliament