Wood Mackenzie: 2017 A Year of Transition for Oil

Wood Mackenzie: 2017 A Year of Transition for Oil

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Architecture, Physics, Science

University

Hard

Created by

Wayground Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the dynamics of oil prices, focusing on the US market's response to price changes and the impact of Saudi Arabia's strategy. It highlights the transition period in 2017, with US shale players poised to react quickly to price incentives. Investor caution and the need for stability in oil prices are emphasized, as they influence capital allocation and market activity. The outlook for mergers and acquisitions in 2017 is explored, noting a shift in activity and significant deals in the Permian Basin and globally.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary incentive for US oil producers to increase production in 2017?

Increased demand from Europe

Decreasing production costs

Rising oil prices

Government subsidies

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which US basin was highlighted as having significant potential for increased oil production?

Marcellus Shale

Permian Basin

Niobrara Formation

Utica Shale

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of Saudi Arabia's strategy to influence the oil market?

It led to a temporary increase in oil prices

It successfully reduced global oil production

It permanently increased oil prices

It had no impact on the market

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the expected trend for oil production in 2018 if prices remain stable?

Production will be unpredictable

Production will increase

Production will remain the same

Production will decrease

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is necessary for US shale companies to increase their investment in production?

Oil prices above $60

Increased global demand

Government incentives

Stable oil prices above $55

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the M&A activity in 2016 differ from historical standards?

It was heavily focused on North America

It was dominated by European companies

It saw a decline in North American deals

It was evenly distributed globally

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the unusual aspect of M&A activity in 2016?

Low activity in North America

Focus on renewable energy

High activity in Asia

Concentration in the Permian Basin