The Size of Japans Stimulus Is Peculiar: Silipo

The Size of Japans Stimulus Is Peculiar: Silipo

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Wayground Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the surprise in timing and size of economic measures, focusing on inflation data and its impact on economic policies. It explores the role of quantitative easing in the global economy, highlighting its effects on fundamentals like job creation and productivity. The conversation includes predictions on future economic actions and debates between austerity and quantitative easing. It concludes with a discussion on corporate and consumer economic strategies, emphasizing the need for internal demand and the risks of income inequality.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was surprising about the recent economic policy decision?

Neither the timing nor the size was surprising.

The size was expected, but the timing was surprising.

Both the timing and size were expected.

The timing was expected, but the size was surprising.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What role has quantitative easing played in the global economy?

It has only affected the stock market.

It has led to a global financial crisis.

It has helped prevent a global financial crisis.

It has had no impact on the global economy.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a major concern about the impact of quantitative easing on economic fundamentals?

It has decreased stock market values.

It has reduced corporate savings.

It has improved job creation and productivity.

It has not significantly improved job creation and productivity.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main argument for choosing austerity over quantitative easing in Japan?

Austerity focuses on reducing corporate savings.

Austerity reduces consumer spending.

Austerity increases government debt.

Austerity is more sustainable in the long term.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential negative consequence of quantitative easing?

Decreased income inequality.

Decreased corporate savings.

Increased corporate investment.

Increased income inequality.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the concern about the sustainability of quantitative easing?

It can continue indefinitely without issues.

It may lead to a false economy.

It will always increase consumer spending.

It will always reduce government debt.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the effect of quantitative easing on corporate savings?

It increases corporate savings to unnecessary levels.

It balances corporate savings perfectly.

It has no effect on corporate savings.

It decreases corporate savings.