Daisy Christodoulou on the emancipatory power of exams

The transcript discusses the concept of character education and the challenges of measuring character. It highlights concerns about grading character, which could favor middle-class students and reinforce stereotypes. Historical examples are provided to support exams as a fair means of assessment, emphasizing their role in promoting meritocracy and social mobility.

What is the main concern about assessing character in education?

• It is too expensive to implement.

• The measurement methods are not yet reliable.

• Students find it too difficult to understand.

• It takes too much time away from other subjects.

What does the speaker suggest about the current state of research on character measurement?

• It is well-established and reliable.

• It is still in its infancy.

• It is completely irrelevant.

• It is more advanced than exam research.

How might grading character affect underprivileged students?

• It might disadvantage them further.

• It would have no impact on them.

• It could provide them with more opportunities.

• It would make assessments easier for them.

What historical figure is mentioned as advocating for exams to ensure fairness?

• RH Tawney

• Angela Duckworth

• Charles Northcutt

• Tristram

Why are exams considered important according to the speaker?

• They are the easiest form of assessment.

• They ensure that privileged students succeed.

• They are the fairest means of assessment.

• They are less stressful for students.