Expert Evidence: Case Studies Part 10

The transcript discusses the analysis of shoe impressions recorded in images one and two. It highlights that the impressions were made by a right foot shoe with a similar sole design to the suspect's shoe. However, due to movement aspects within the impression, it was not possible to determine a size correlation, leading to an inconclusive determination.

What was the key similarity between the shoe impression and the suspect's shoe?

• The color of the shoe

• The sole design

• The size of the shoe

• The brand of the shoe

Which foot's shoe was involved in the impression recorded in images one and two?

• Left foot

• Right foot

• Neither foot

• Both feet

Why was it difficult to determine a size correlation between the shoe impression and the suspect's shoe?

• The shoe impression was too faint

• The suspect's shoe was not available

• Movement aspects within the impression

• The images were unclear

What was the conclusion regarding the shoe impression analysis?

• The suspect's shoe was a perfect match

• The suspect's shoe was too large

• The shoe impression was too small

• The analysis was inconclusive

What aspect of the shoe impression led to an inconclusive determination?

• The color of the shoe

• The brand of the shoe

• The movement aspects

• The material of the shoe