Cómo hablar con otros que piensan distinto

The video explores the journey from science to education, highlighting the challenges of post-truth and tribalism. It discusses the limitations of evidence and education in changing beliefs, emphasizing the need for effective communication. The speaker addresses the impact of tribalism on dialogue and democracy, proposing strategies to foster pluralism and improve discourse. The importance of separating ideas from identity and promoting freedom of expression is underscored, with practical suggestions for overcoming tribalism and encouraging meaningful conversations.

What was the speaker's initial disappointment regarding the use of evidence?

• Evidence was not enough to change beliefs.

• Evidence was not available.

• Evidence was too complex to understand.

• Evidence was not convincing.

What did the speaker identify as a new path after experiencing post-truth?

• Focusing on scientific research.

• Improving communication strategies.

• Creating more evidence.

• Developing new educational methods.

How does tribalism affect people's opinions according to the speaker?

• It makes them more open-minded.

• It causes opinions to become more extreme.

• It encourages diverse viewpoints.

• It leads to better understanding.

According to the speaker, what is necessary for a healthy democracy?

• Avoidance of disagreements.

• Strict adherence to evidence.

• Broad and honest conversations.

• Homogeneous opinions.

What is the subtle form of censorship mentioned by the speaker?

• Censorship by government.

• Censorship from above.

• Censorship through media.

• Censorship from below.

What does the speaker say about the illusion of consensus?

• It strengthens democracy.

• It is a sign of agreement.

• It is beneficial for society.

• It arises from silencing dissent.

What does the speaker suggest is a threat to free speech?

• Censorship from above.

• Censorship from below.

• Educational limitations.

• Lack of evidence.

What does the speaker propose to distinguish in order to break tribalism?

• Between truth and post-truth.

• Between what we believe and how we believe it.

• Between evidence and education.

• Between science and beliefs.

What is one of the speaker's suggestions to overcome tribalism?

• Ignoring dissenting voices.

• Promoting pluralism.

• Avoiding controversial topics.

• Focusing on personal beliefs.

What does the speaker compare conversations to?

• A scientific experiment.

• A classroom discussion.

• A political debate.

• A fire that needs managing.