Stewart Brand + Mark Z. Jacobson: Debate: Does the world need nuclear energy?

The debate centers on whether nuclear energy is what the world needs now. Stewart Brand argues in favor, highlighting nuclear's low greenhouse gas emissions and potential for disarmament. Mark Jacobson counters, emphasizing the risks of nuclear proliferation and the viability of renewables. Audience members contribute their views, and a final vote shows a shift in opinion, though both sides gain supporters.

What was the initial audience poll result regarding nuclear energy?

• 60% in favor, 40% against

• 25% in favor, 75% against

• 75% in favor, 25% against

• 50% in favor, 50% against

According to Stewart Brand, what is a major advantage of nuclear energy over coal?

• Nuclear energy is cheaper

• Nuclear energy produces less waste

• Nuclear energy is more reliable

• Nuclear energy is easier to implement

What is one of the main environmental concerns Stewart Brand addresses about nuclear energy?

• Nuclear waste management

• Large land footprint

• Water pollution

• High carbon emissions

Mark Jacobson argues that nuclear energy contributes to which of the following?

• Increased air pollution

• Faster energy production

• Nuclear weapons proliferation

• Lower energy costs

According to Mark Jacobson, which energy source has the smallest footprint?

• Geothermal

• Nuclear

• Wind

• Solar

What does Mark Jacobson suggest about the reliability of renewable energy?

• It is unreliable

• It is only reliable in certain regions

• It can be made reliable with proper management

• It is more reliable than nuclear

What is a concern raised by the audience about transporting nuclear waste?

• Potential for accidents and terrorism

• Lack of transportation infrastructure

• Environmental regulations

• High transportation costs

What solution does Alex propose for nuclear weapons?

• Recycling into energy

• Storage in secure facilities

• Disarmament

• Selling to other countries

What does Stewart Brand suggest about small nuclear reactors?

• They need legislative support to advance

• They are too expensive

• They are unsafe

• They are not yet developed

What was the final audience vote result after the debate?

• 75% in favor, 25% against

• 60% in favor, 40% against

• 50% in favor, 50% against

• 65% in favor, 35% against