Critics: EPA Rule Would Limit Research To Protect Air, Public Health

The EPA's proposed rule to require disclosure of raw data for environmental research has sparked controversy. While the EPA claims it enhances transparency, critics argue it could hinder important studies and weaken environmental protections. The proposal has support from industry groups but faces opposition from health organizations. The Trump administration has rolled back numerous environmental regulations, facing legal challenges for some actions.

What is the main goal of the EPA's proposed rule regarding research data?

• To enhance transparency and ensure high-quality science

• To reduce the number of scientists involved in research

• To limit the number of studies conducted

• To increase funding for environmental research

Which study is cited as potentially being disallowed under the new EPA rule?

• A 2010 study on the effects of pesticides on wildlife

• A 1993 Harvard study on air pollution and premature deaths

• A 2005 study on water pollution in the Great Lakes

• A 2015 study on climate change impacts on agriculture

Which groups have expressed support for the EPA's proposed rule?

• Environmental advocacy groups

• Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council

• Academic institutions

• Public health organizations

What has the Trump administration done in relation to environmental rules?

• Implemented stricter air quality standards

• Rolled back more than 80 environmental rules

• Strengthened over 100 environmental regulations

• Increased funding for environmental research

What legal challenge is the Trump administration facing related to environmental policy?

• A challenge to increase coal production

• A case to reduce national park protections

• A lawsuit over revoking California's fuel efficiency standards

• A dispute over increasing oil drilling in Alaska