Sayeeda Warsi in defense of 'Great' Britain

Sayeeda Warsi in defense of 'Great' Britain

Assessment

Interactive Video

Religious Studies, Other, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Wayground Content

FREE Resource

The speaker, a member of the House of Lords, argues against a motion that claims there's nothing great about Britain. She highlights Britain's multiculturalism, values, humor, and global influence. The speech covers achievements in sports, arts, and diplomacy, emphasizing the country's unique qualities. The speaker shares personal experiences as a Muslim cabinet minister and discusses public services and the English language's global impact. The conclusion urges the audience to reject the motion, celebrating Britain's greatness.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's initial stance on the motion being debated?

Indifferent to the motion

Supportive of the motion

Against the motion

Neutral towards the motion

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which cultural trait is highlighted as a British strength?

Dry sense of humor

Overdramatic reactions

Seriousness in all matters

Lack of tolerance

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Britain's rank in the Olympic Medal League according to the speaker?

Fourth

Third

Second

First

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which author is mentioned as part of Britain's literary greatness?

Mark Twain

Jane Austen

Ernest Hemingway

F. Scott Fitzgerald

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of the English language according to the speaker?

It is spoken by 5 million people

It is only used in trade

It is the language of a small community

It is the world's language of choice

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest is the only negative aspect of Great Britain?

The education system

The weather

The economy

The rubbish

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker imply about Britain's armed forces?

They embrace a human rights framework

They lack diversity

They are poorly trained

They are corrupt