Does This Chord Even Exist? - TWO MINUTE MUSIC THEORY #52

The video discusses the 164 chord in Roman numeral analysis, often seen in authentic cadences. It questions the chord's functional existence in common practice harmony, suggesting it acts more like a dominant function. Alternative labels like 564 or CAD 64 are proposed, but each has its drawbacks. The video concludes that while the chord's nomenclature may be outdated, labeling it remains subjective.

What is the primary function of the 164 chord in common practice harmony?

• Subdominant function

• Tonic function

• Passing function

• Dominant function

Why might some theorists prefer to label the 164 chord as 564?

• It is a more traditional label.

• It simplifies the spelling of the chord.

• It aligns better with the chord's dominant function.

• It reflects the tonic function more accurately.

What is one proposed relabeling of the 164 chord that involves a double suspension?

• 6, 4 to 5, 3

• 5, 6 to 4, 3

• 4, 6 to 5, 3

• 5, 4 to 6, 3

What is a potential drawback of labeling the chord as CAD 64?

• It may confuse it with a tonic chord.

• It could be mistaken for a jazz chord notation.

• It does not indicate the chord's inversion.

• It is not recognized in classical music.

Why might it not be necessary to update the nomenclature of the 164 chord?

• The chord's function is clear without relabeling.

• The chord is only relevant in jazz contexts.

• The current label is universally accepted.

• The chord is rarely used in modern music.