Review into phone and internet surveillance laws published

David Anderson QC's report on surveillance recommends continued bulk data collection with stricter safeguards and judicial oversight. The report highlights the need for legal clarity and questions the government's policy on retaining web histories. It details threats thwarted by GCHQ and validates the necessity of security powers while respecting human rights. Challenges with US tech companies are noted, and the government will review the report's 124 recommendations before drafting new legislation.

What does David Anderson QC suggest regarding the decision-making process for intercepting communications?

• Decisions should be made by a committee of experts.

• Political figures should make the decisions.

• Judges should make the decisions.

• The public should vote on decisions.

What is one of the main concerns Anderson raises about the current surveillance laws?

• They are too lenient.

• They are too strict.

• They are confusing and spread over many places.

• They are not enforced properly.

What does the report suggest about the government's policy on web browsing histories?

• It should be reduced to one year.

• It needs more justification for a two-year retention.

• It should be extended to five years.

• It should be abolished completely.

How did bulk interception by GCHQ contribute to security according to the report?

• It led to the arrest of a known terrorist leader.

• It helped prevent a bomb plot in mainland Europe.

• It stopped a cyber attack on government servers.

• It uncovered a major financial fraud scheme.

What challenge does Anderson identify regarding US-based Internet platforms?

• They are unwilling to cooperate with any government.

• They find Anderson's proposals unworkable.

• They have already implemented the necessary changes.

• They are too focused on profit to care about security.